Posted by A coder on July 29, 2000 at 19:23:04:

In Reply to: Re: Arbiters! posted by Trasthe on July 29, 2000 at 19:11:17:

> > For the first time I've ever even seen, I
> > got a conjurer wanted for stealing from me
> > with his monkey...Hell yeah, rock on Trasthe!

> Did he actually do it, I wonder? I wasn't 100% sure, and I really didn't want to flag him -- he's a very nicely roleplayed young character, in my opinion. But, there's no way Trasthe would let him off.

> So, Blik, if you're out there, I'm sorry. :(

> -Trasthe

Follow Ups:

• Okay smartasses ;-) You made your point. But really, if this Arbiter wasn't sure and didn't want to flag.. you shouldn't have been pressured into doing it, if there was lack of evidence. ya know? You're the boss. (n/t) A coder 20:40:29 7/29/2000 (5)
  • Differentiation of Player and Character. [text] Trasthe 21:24:57 7/29/2000 (4)
    • Oh, absolutely. But even then Arbiters do have limitations. I don' disagree with your decision, just wondering just how much evidence there was. (n/t) A coder 21:32:02 7/29/2000 (3)
      • There was enough that more Arbiters would flag than not. [n/t] Trasthe 21:36:53 7/29/2000 (1)
        • Cool, thanks for settling my curiosity ;-) (n/t) A coder 22:03:20 7/29/2000 (0)
      • There was enough that more Arbiters would flag than not. [n/t] Trasthe 21:36:33 7/29/2000 (0)
• When was the last time you were 100% sure about something you didn't see (if he was 95% sure then that is good enough) NT Knight Rider 19:36:32 7/29/2000 (2)
  • I disagree. 96.72% sure is good enough. 95% is just careless. n/t Jagaub 19:48:49 7/29/2000 (1)
    • I disagree. 99 and forty-four one hundredths percent is the only acceptable medium. N/t Desert Rose 20:00:00 7/29/2000 (0)

Post a Followup