Burden of Proof [txt]

Burden of Proof [txt]:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Trasthe on July 30, 2000 at 21:06:57:

In Reply to: Re: I'll say this: posted by Magtograme/Jachyra on July 30, 2000 at 20:58:42:

Much as with a civil trial in real life, the burden of proof is the "balance of probabilities." For anyone who says you need hard-core, 100% proof, you're, well, dead wrong.

Arbiters can, and will, flag based on strong probabilities. If the Arbiter is sure you did it, and circumstantial evidence points to you, he's quite likely to flag -- even if someone wasn't standing there, watching.

-Trasthe

Follow Ups:

Small Text, please read. Clemmy, Player of Coutnless Elders, (and even one Lord Arbiter) 01:21:10 7/31/2000 (0)
Re: Burden of Proof [txt] Magtograme 21:12:01 7/30/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> Much as with a civil trial in real life, the burden of proof is the "balance of probabilities." For anyone who says you need hard-core, 100% proof, you're, well, dead wrong. > Arbiters can, and will, flag based on strong probabilities. If the Arbiter is sure you did it, and circumstantial evidence points to you, he's quite likely to flag -- even if someone wasn't standing there, watching. > -Trasthe