Posted by Warrior on August 7, 2000 at 17:22:30:
In Reply to: One class I wish CF had. A mage-warrior mix that was not A-P posted by Bacrie on August 7, 2000 at 15:58:35:
Why exacatly does the a-p class have to be evil besides what is implied by the name? I'm sure it would be a much more fun class to play if there wasn't a restrictions on aligments. Can you image the new dimension it would add if A-p's could join dawn or slyvans? instead of being forced into empire all the time. I don't really see any spells or skills that force this class to be evil only. Well except for unholy blessing, but that could be easily changed with a change in spell name. (there is an old belief that the weapons grow stronger after killing in battle, and that the weapon becomes mystical in nature and is said to warn it's owner of danger and protect him from harm. Does that make all warriors evil? No, I don't think so.) I think that this class was forced to be evil because the creators couldn't come up with a name other then Anti-Paladin (no offense creators I love cf, was just trying to make a small point). > The A-P class is decent though hard on occasion cause it allows the blend of magic and fighting skills. I don't always like the roleplay that requires cause I'd like to run more of a NG char. Yes I know some say rangers are the mix but they are forrest oriented. Just think it would be nice to have a class say Explorers who have learned magic and fighting from thier travels. I don't count shamans paladins and such as they derive thier power from the Gods. And *gasp* yes some wish to draw from power and not beg the gods to give it to them