Ok now i'v been gone for a while... any one care to catch me up on whats happening? whos the ever changing leader of the ragers? what happened to Thror? nt/graatch

Ok now i'v been gone for a while... any one care to catch me up on whats happening? whos the ever changing leader of the ragers? what happened to Thror? nt/graatch:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Drekten on August 19, 2000 at 11:01:19:

Follow Ups:

let see Battle 12:11:44 8/19/2000 (17)
- Allow me to clean up this mess of a post. Eugio 13:19:43 8/19/2000 (1)
  - Narlock's an elf N/T Booger 13:40:13 8/19/2000 (0)
- How many times do the Imms have to reply that the Conjurers are the way they want them before people stop saying they're overpowered? (n/t) Zepachu 12:58:08 8/19/2000 (14)
  - Because being overpowered has nothing to do with whether the imms like them or not, Hitler wasn't judged on his own terms... Graham 13:46:50 8/19/2000 (13)
    - The Imms make sure things work out to be balanced. Therefore everything is underpowered, and everything is overpowered. (n/t) Zepachu 13:49:07 8/19/2000 (12)
      - And sometimes the imms are NOT right in their judgment, don't believe everything they tell you, try to think for yourself (n/t) Joshu 13:51:07 8/19/2000 (11)
        
        I don't believe everything they tell me, I do think for myself. And I came to this conclusion over the 6 years I've played at CF. (n/t) Zepachu 13:52:20 8/19/2000 (10)
        
        If you have been playing for 6 years, how come it was so easy to take 2 con off you? n/t Dyson 18:04:24 8/19/2000 (2)
        
        Need I continue to say it... I played Zepachu the exact way I wanted... (TEXT) Zepachu 09:59:09 8/20/2000 (0)
        
        Dyson, you don't really think you are tough do you? Lathzzaan 07:13:40 8/20/2000 (0)
        
        So you don't believe everything you are told yet the only reason that conjies are balanced is because they told you so? (n/t) Graham 15:26:19 8/19/2000 (6)
        
        "And I came to this conclusion..." That statement means that I realized it over the years I'VE played here, through experience. (n/t) Zepachu 15:35:48 8/19/2000 (5)
        
        So why didn't you write that as the subject of the 1st post instead of what you -did- write o/c/n/t Graham 16:18:24 8/19/2000 (4)
        
        It was not applicable then. I was only commenting on Conjurers. Got more comments? I can do this all night, Graham. (n/t) Zepachu 16:28:16 8/19/2000 (3)
        
        Umm thats the whole , its not applicable to conjurers, they are not balanced "because thats what the imms say" as you wrote, are you sure your not waigerits, he misses the point alot too..(t/w/d/n/n/f/t) Graham 16:46:47 8/19/2000 (2)
        
        My bologna has a first name, it's O-S-C-A-R. This conversation is over. (n/t) Zepachu 17:00:54 8/19/2000 (1)
        
        last word? Graham 17:17:05 8/19/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> nt