Posted by TotW(VIP) on August 25, 2000 at 13:06:49:

In Reply to: Pure unadulterated genius posted by Imbrogno(VIP) on August 25, 2000 at 12:10:23:

He's not you.
He's not Imbrogno.
He's not Polemachus.

He should not *HAVE* to say anything at all. Maybe that is your idea of stellar roleplay and leadership skills, but it is not Narlock's. If you like it, roll a Master. If you don't, roll a Master and take leadership from him, or instead just roll up and play another Arbiter, the cabal where the leadership really cares about fairness and honesty.

In case I seem to be disparaging you, I'm not. What I'm suggesting is: He is the Leader of Master. He can Lead and play anyway he wants. If you disagree with him, take it to the game. This whole thread is filled with stuff that, albeit interesting, are things to talk to Narlock about in person, and the thread (outside of your "is it ok for a leader to lead the way he wants to" question -legitimate- and now answered by Nepenthe) is one that can be debated IC.

Follow Ups:

• I don't know TotW Imbrogno(VIP) 13:15:51 8/25/2000 (2)
  • Also agreed! (n/t) Proud Blade(VIP) 08:54:11 8/26/2000 (0)
  • There, I agree *completely* n/t Tracker of the Wicked(VIP) 13:27:29 8/25/2000 (0)

Post a Followup