Posted by Shokai(IMM) on September 2, 2000 at 13:03:57:
In Reply to: yet still... posted by Shokai(IMM) on September 2, 2000 at 13:00:53:
> "Pictures of matchstick men and you
> Who is worse? The person who 'can't get laid' or the person who sees that as the only reason someone would object to mudsex? I personally think mudsex is fairly vile, I think it's one step below phone sex. I can't tell you how many times I've wanted to lysol my eyes when I went to snoop someone and found them playing a nice rousing game of hide the weasel on the mud. I'd also point out that lashing out at people who have a problem with it, makes you look remarkably silly and foolish. I'll equate this to a real life situation...how would you feel if you walked into a mall and saw a 500lb man and a 500lb female crreating the beast with 2 backs (and 20 chins)? Outside of morbid fascination, revulsion would probably creep in there.
> I guess my basic feeling about this post is that you're jumping to conclusions over why people are irratated by mudsex, jumping to incorrect conclusions I might add. I also wonder why it bothers you so much that people have a problem with it? Feeling guilty? Feeling bad? You might want to consider what's got you so irked, eh?
> images of matchstick men and you
> alls I ever see is them and you.."