Winner: Carrion Fields, LLC "Employee of the Day"

Winner: Carrion Fields, LLC "Employee of the Day":
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Proud Blade(VIP) on September 2, 2000 at 19:13:42:

In Reply to: yet still... posted by Shokai(IMM) on September 2, 2000 at 13:00:53:

Well put, Mr. Shokai.

Ekirhal: Don't think you are breaking new ground. There have been any number of female characters who have chosen the overeager nymphette role before you, some of whom understood the necessity of little seductress tricks like subtlety, selectivity, or clever innuendos. It's a tired routine, and it has been done better.

Stating that people who are annoyed by mudsex are somehow repressed or asexual is incredibly immature.

The CForum is an OOC place for discussion. It's a great place for finding out about the game, debating its strengths and weaknesses, or just celebrating that nifty piece of software and the people who use it. Clumsy flirting with the naive boys who will respond to it is... well, not a sign that you are any more secure than those at whom you just lashed out.

> Who is worse? The person who 'can't get laid' or the person who sees that as the only reason someone would object to mudsex? I personally think mudsex is fairly vile, I think it's one step below phone sex. I can't tell you how many times I've wanted to lysol my eyes when I went to snoop someone and found them playing a nice rousing game of hide the weasel on the mud. I'd also point out that lashing out at people who have a problem with it, makes you look remarkably silly and foolish. I'll equate this to a real life situation...how would you feel if you walked into a mall and saw a 500lb man and a 500lb female crreating the beast with 2 backs (and 20 chins)? Outside of morbid fascination, revulsion would probably creep in there.
> I guess my basic feeling about this post is that you're jumping to conclusions over why people are irratated by mudsex, jumping to incorrect conclusions I might add. I also wonder why it bothers you so much that people have a problem with it? Feeling guilty? Feeling bad? You might want to consider what's got you so irked, eh?

> "Pictures of matchstick men and you
> images of matchstick men and you
> alls I ever see is them and you.."

Follow Ups:

Shokai and Proud Blade... Ekirhal 21:04:52 9/2/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> Well put, Mr. Shokai. > Ekirhal: Don't think you are breaking new ground. There have been any number of female characters who have chosen the overeager nymphette role before you, some of whom understood the necessity of little seductress tricks like subtlety, selectivity, or clever innuendos. It's a tired routine, and it has been done better. > Stating that people who are annoyed by mudsex are somehow repressed or asexual is incredibly immature. > The CForum is an OOC place for discussion. It's a great place for finding out about the game, debating its strengths and weaknesses, or just celebrating that nifty piece of software and the people who use it. Clumsy flirting with the naive boys who will respond to it is... well, not a sign that you are any more secure than those at whom you just lashed out. > > Who is worse? The person who 'can't get laid' or the person who sees that as the only reason someone would object to mudsex? I personally think mudsex is fairly vile, I think it's one step below phone sex. I can't tell you how many times I've wanted to lysol my eyes when I went to snoop someone and found them playing a nice rousing game of hide the weasel on the mud. I'd also point out that lashing out at people who have a problem with it, makes you look remarkably silly and foolish. I'll equate this to a real life situation...how would you feel if you walked into a mall and saw a 500lb man and a 500lb female crreating the beast with 2 backs (and 20 chins)? Outside of morbid fascination, revulsion would probably creep in there. > > I guess my basic feeling about this post is that you're jumping to conclusions over why people are irratated by mudsex, jumping to incorrect conclusions I might add. I also wonder why it bothers you so much that people have a problem with it? Feeling guilty? Feeling bad? You might want to consider what's got you so irked, eh? > > <i>"Pictures of matchstick men and you > > images of matchstick men and you > > alls I ever see is them and you.."</i>

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]