Not without the head n/t

Not without the head n/t:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Saltimbanko on September 9, 2000 at 13:56:09:

In Reply to: Re: cabal run-down. posted by Manisk on September 9, 2000 at 13:12:04:

> > > arbies can call guards without the book.
> > > ragers can call truesight without the head.(pk power)

> > If the arbies couldnt call guards without the book, they wouldnt be able to do anything about the criminals.
> > If the ragers wouldnt be able to use truesight without the head, it would be quite easy to prevent them from taking it back. A warrior dont have any way of seeing invis, so just invis the outer guardian. That would be quite silly. (Atleast that is my thoughts.)

> Uhm... they can bloodthirst...

Follow Ups:

oh yeah... *bonk self* (nt) Manisk 15:09:46 9/9/2000 (1)
- Bloodthirst wouldn't make them attack the guardian either, if they couldn't see it (nt) Rune(VIP) 19:14:09 9/9/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > > > arbies can call guards without the book. > > > > ragers can call truesight without the head.(pk power) > > > If the arbies couldnt call guards without the book, they wouldnt be able to do anything about the criminals. > > > If the ragers wouldnt be able to use truesight without the head, it would be quite easy to prevent them from taking it back. A warrior dont have any way of seeing invis, so just invis the outer guardian. That would be quite silly. (Atleast that is my thoughts.) > > Uhm... they can bloodthirst...