Point of fact

Point of fact:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Nepenthe(IMM) on September 12, 2000 at 14:56:26:

In Reply to: Re: By the way, tack up all the other cabals for grouping with members of their cabal. That has to be a permagroup as well since your going off of this logistical point of view. posted by Watcher on September 12, 2000 at 14:11:01:

No rules enforcement took place in this case. . .we're talking about a cabal imm choosing to try to jar someone in their cabal not acting like they're in that cabal into doing it right.

As a parallel: will you ever see an Empire anathed for grouping with other members of his/her sect all the time? Nope. If s/he gets the axe, it's for something else.

Would you see an Empire anathed if s/he spent half his/her time grouped with the same member of Entropy? I think you probably would.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> No rules enforcement took place in this case. . .we're talking about a cabal imm choosing to try to jar someone in their cabal not acting like they're in that cabal into doing it right. > As a parallel: will you ever see an Empire anathed for grouping with other members of his/her sect all the time? Nope. If s/he gets the axe, it's for something else. > Would you see an Empire anathed if s/he spent half his/her time grouped with the same member of Entropy? I think you probably would.