Posted by Someone on September 17, 2000 at 13:10:13:

In Reply to: question to the imms why? posted by Rager on September 17, 2000 at 12:44:05:

> we all know water elementals rape felars and arials such and such
> we all see fireballs from fire elementals do it's thing
> but why is it that when I use a blade of flame on a water elemental, it takes no extra damage? vice versa

Follow Ups:

• It evaporates a portion of water, converting that portion to steam. A common blade through water? No change to the volume, hence a flaming sword should do more damage... N/T maughbrie 14:36:40 9/17/2000 (5)
  • And the sword should be destoryed Someone 15:12:15 9/17/2000 (4)
    • And the elemental should be destroyed. :) maughbrie 15:20:07 9/17/2000 (3)
      • So how many angels can dance on the head of a pin, then? (n/i/t) Proud Blade(VIP) 16:07:07 9/17/2000 (0)
      • Nowhere in what I've said to this point... maughbrie 16:00:00 9/17/2000 (0)
      • Yeah, you are right. ragers need it easier. Their powers suck, they should be able to spellbane elementals and archons and priest. n/t Someone 15:25:30 9/17/2000 (0)
• ever tried putting the sun in water? an ass 13:24:47 9/17/2000 (2)
  • Here's what would happen if you did... Daryl(VIP) 17:27:28 9/17/2000 (0)
  • That is just what happens when you stick a wavedancer in a fire elemental. n/t Another ass 14:02:05 9/17/2000 (0)

Post a Followup