I... agree. *gasp* (n.txt):

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Zepachu on September 26, 2000 at 11:09:28:

In Reply to: The thing you both seem to be missing here is... posted by Umguy on September 26, 2000 at 11:05:44:

> Graatch needs to fuel his hatred for ragers. Nevermind that no mage with half a brain should ever HAVE to fight ragers. Nevermind the fact that no mage (except a sphere honor one, and you bring that on yourself) should ever need to tank a rager solo. Nevermind the fact that mages get many more pluses than minuses....the pure fact here is that Graatch has always had to whine about ragers. Furthermore, Graatch wants to have chars (say what you will about not playing anymore, G-man, you post here often enough that you still have feelings toward CF) that can take anyone 1 on 1, but doesn't want to play a warrior type class that is meant to do exactly that.

> Oh, and to put my money where my mouth is: Invoker shields alone are enough to lay the smack down on any warrior. We're talking two chars with no cabal powers here. Now, if you want to add in transform for the 'voker, and berserker rager powers for the warrior, I still say the invoker wins, if he's smart (it's harder, but he wins).

> Now if the complaint is that an uncaballed invoker can't beat a berserker rager...cry me a fucking river, and join a cabal and/or make friends who will go smack the rager while you shield them.


Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]