Re: Given Nepenthe's comments below (re: Nature/Magic):

Re: Given Nepenthe's comments below (re: Nature/Magic)::
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by The US Government: on October 15, 2000 at 20:02:40:

In Reply to: Given Nepenthe's comments below (re: Nature/Magic): posted by Curious on October 15, 2000 at 19:57:25:

> A question:

> If "It doesn't really matter if you like that nature screws with magic. It doesn't really matter if you think Thera should work that way. Thera does work that way."

> Assuming things are symmetrical (i.e. magic screws with nature, which it certainly seems to do.)...

> Why are transmuters and invokers probably the #3 and #4 most common classes in Sylvan? How do they get around the fact that their magic controls and alters nature?

Follow Ups:

You obviously no Chinese. (N/T) The Pumpkin King 20:14:27 10/15/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > A question: > > If "It doesn't really matter if you like that nature screws with magic. It doesn't really matter if you think Thera should work that way. Thera does work that way." > > Assuming things are symmetrical (i.e. magic screws with nature, which it certainly seems to do.)... > > Why are transmuters and invokers probably the #3 and #4 most common classes in Sylvan? How do they get around the fact that their magic controls and alters nature?