Wait you can't get help if your slept? That is retarded! Are they Barbarians or friggin knights?! N/T:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Shadow Demon on October 24, 2000 at 13:48:12:

In Reply to: Serious question about Battle, the direction its going, and its Imms posted by Cathoir on October 24, 2000 at 13:31:52:

> I'll rant later, first the serious question. Are you trying to change the direction the cabal has been going and how you want a rager to act (a la Eshlina and Jezral uninducting me as Sermak and changing cabal policies cause they didn't like sylvans being particularly violent)? There's been a string of rp heavy more thoughtful leaders (Vizarsh, Aniedra), and suddenly with Tarakh things started to switch back to how the cabal has always been. Are you unhappy with this? Alright, rant time.

> Alright, what happened is just a complete load of bullshit. I was unaware we were now just a derivative of Empire. To the untrained eye, it looks like y'all were just unhappy with how many people battle had, so you'd uninduct people's chars for retarded reasons. Granted some of the members were getting a little greedy, but does this mean that you should shape cabal policy (no help when slept) to aiming at getting us killed? Last I checked, we aren't knights (interesting imm correlation contained within... nevermind). If you want to change the direction of the cabal, that's fine, but with all this new heavy imm control of the cabal and policy changes... well, you're destroying the very essence of the cabal that so many of us call home. I can't tell who is doing what cause y'all are always cloaked, but if it's a combined effort... i'd just as soon have Thror's hammer never be find, have BT go back to whence he came from (i'd like to see that cabal revived), Holtz can do whatever, and bring back Nimbus and Vassagon damn't! Sure, not gonna happen.... but damn, I miss the old battle.


Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]