My point wasn't that you sucked as leader...

My point wasn't that you sucked as leader...:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Umguy on October 25, 2000 at 13:25:30:

In Reply to: Well. posted by Tarakh on October 25, 2000 at 13:15:46:

I have no idea. I'm not playing a rager nor any hero-level chars at all and don't know about the whole rager-arb thing. I only know you deleted, and I know that due to that, rager numbers will decline for a time. I also predict that whoever becomes leader will stop the war, or that ragers will get their asses handed to them (maybe not the heroes, but the youngins who try to re-take the head, only to find out the imperials/master hold it, so they get flagged for intruding on the arbiter cabal).

Follow Ups:

Heh. Tarakh 13:30:17 10/25/2000 (3)
- Maybe it's just me... Umguy 13:45:32 10/25/2000 (2)
  - Yes, yes, YES! Quintius 14:36:49 10/25/2000 (0)
  - That would've been first assumption after hearing something like that, and minimizing inductions is something that a leader should do from 'Go' IMHO. There has to be a bench mark set above the reach of idiocy, most cabals don't have such a mark. nt Imbrogno(VIP) 13:56:25 10/25/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> I have no idea. I'm not playing a rager nor any hero-level chars at all and don't know about the whole rager-arb thing. I only know you deleted, and I know that due to that, rager numbers will decline for a time. I also predict that whoever becomes leader will stop the war, or that ragers will get their asses handed to them (maybe not the heroes, but the youngins who try to re-take the head, only to find out the imperials/master hold it, so they get flagged for intruding on the arbiter cabal).