Hrm:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Quintius on October 25, 2000 at 20:35:41:

In Reply to: I agree, 150%. It's more than a little odd that Quintius of all people is instructing ragers on how they 'should act' (small quote): posted by TotW(VIP) on October 25, 2000 at 15:51:47:

Theoretically, I could use the same logic and refute any and all critiscism of Arbiters by ragers. Reguardless of who or what you play, if a cabal has a stated goal or stated stadards you follow them.

But yes, I see what you mean. I will admit that my experiences at the receiving end of a rather brutal Rager war has really colored my view on them, though I still think I have a few valid points, but I've already pretty much said what I felt.

> Then come here and flame the rager philosophy.

> You and Imbrogno are educated, intelligent people. I trust that both of you understand that you are less than qualified to pass on insight, and that first-hand experience will add a great deal of validity and importance to your insights.

I really haven't been trying to flame anyone or be an ass and made a real effort to put a lot of "in my perspective" and "from what I see" phrases in my posts. If that hasn't come across, my bad.

If I had my choice in this matter, I'd just like to back to the status quo before all this started. A *lot* of the anger has spilled over into the forum and has colored IC actions.

Like Mag said, let's just drag this damn conflict out into the street and shoot it.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]