About spheres..

About spheres..:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Daishan(VIP) on October 26, 2000 at 00:45:44:

Would it be entirely out of order to get rid of the
'who sphere' command? In my opinion it enhances
roleplay very little, and not only that, but
lets say you were going to pick the sphere of deception
wouldnt that hamper you a bit?

I dont know.. feedback from imms as to why we have it
would be great.

I dont see a real good purpose for it though.

Follow Ups:

You obviously haven't played a sphere deception, have you? Caecus 13:15:19 10/26/2000 (1)
- His whole point was "Is the who sphere command" nescessary. The sphere of deception was a minor idea. n/t Alhadrin 13:32:13 10/26/2000 (0)
Re: About spheres.. astoria 09:24:35 10/26/2000 (2)
- Why aren't newbies allowed to see who is in thier sphere? NT Treboei 11:58:51 10/26/2000 (1)
  - Probably so people can't conveniently 'check' other people's spheres. (n/t) Proud Blade(VIP) 12:56:14 10/26/2000 (0)
I may be wrong, but I think if you're sphere deception or concealment 'who sphere' doesn't show anything. nt Imbrogno(VIP) 05:42:47 10/26/2000 (2)
- Re: You're not wrong... (n/t) Harlequin 15:00:43 10/26/2000 (0)
- Even if it did, in those spheres in particular, revealing what you see could make your god....less than pleased with you. (n/t) Falstaff 06:15:37 10/26/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> Would it be entirely out of order to get rid of the > 'who sphere' command? In my opinion it enhances > roleplay very little, and not only that, but > lets say you were going to pick the sphere of deception > wouldnt that hamper you a bit? > I dont know.. feedback from imms as to why we have it > would be great. > I dont see a real good purpose for it though.