Posted by Taithin on October 30, 2000 at 11:57:16:
In Reply to: Aside from being warm/fuzzy/kinder/gentler... why do this? (n/i/t) posted by Proud Blade(VIP) on October 30, 2000 at 11:33:46:
> Keep in mind that Ragers get truesight, with a drawback, as an example. Without truesight, they'd be really, really dead. > > I think that cabals should be able to keep some of their powers even when they lose their items. Examples Ragers keep spell bane, Masters keep magic control, Sylvans keep cameloen, empire keeps bloodoath (jk I don't know much about empire powers), entopy keeps randomizero or dopple gang, arbiters keeps vilgance. I think this is especially should be true for ragers since they get screwed over when they don't have their head. And make it have as effective without the items such as lasting half as long, or taking twice the amount of energy to call. Just a thought, what do you people think? I think Empire should get bloodoath, and Arbiters wanted, without items, as it's an integral part of the cabal existing. Masters can progress magic without the Orb, Sylvan protect wildlife without sapling. It's pretty hard to conquer Thera without any people, or protect people as an Arbiter when you can't even mark someone.