damnit.. that should say.. a second chance not second chances (n/t)

damnit.. that should say.. a second chance not second chances (n/t):
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by TFA on November 1, 2000 at 14:29:09:

In Reply to: but on the off chance... posted by The First Apostle on November 1, 2000 at 14:28:12:

> > > Now, obviously I'm not for a moment arguing that we should conduct imm staff decisions by popular majority vote or some such nonsense, but in cases such as these, where the sole question up for debate is "Has he contributed to improving the mud for the players?" it's narrow-minded to exclude feedback to the contrary.

> > The point I think you're ignoring is that this feedback we're excluding is coming after the decision was already made.

> There is at least one immortal that I know of that was given second chances and ended up becoming
> quite successful. If Jaldean were to get another opportunity, wouldn't this information be
> helpful.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > > > Now, obviously I'm not for a moment arguing that we should conduct imm staff decisions by popular majority vote or some such nonsense, but in cases such as these, where the sole question up for debate is "Has he contributed to improving the mud for the players?" it's narrow-minded to exclude feedback to the contrary. > > > The point I think you're ignoring is that this feedback we're excluding is coming after the decision was already made. > > There is at least one immortal that I know of that was given second chances and ended up becoming > > quite successful. If Jaldean were to get another opportunity, wouldn't this information be > > helpful.