Posted by Drinks with Evil. on November 1, 2000 at 22:18:36:
In Reply to: Woah woah woah. 1000 is a *tad* optimistic. I'd say more around 400 for frequent + rare players. n/t posted by `Shady on November 1, 2000 at 18:16:36:
I think you could pull a couple hundred, maybe, off the top who logon, are never really noticed, and disappear. Still way over the 'common sense' numbers I'm sure, but I like to think the players are there. At least I hope so, even if those players never make the jump to being prey, let alone predator. Of course we all see the game through our own perspective, whether it be eternal newbie, regular player, elite burnout, or just off-schedule player. I seriously doubt the Imms would count the jellybeans in the jar anyway, and risk setting another benchmark the game could be relentlessly judged against. They get enough regurgiated crap on opinions without throwing actual statistics (the third lie) into the mix.