He may have improved, but he also lost %. I'd put money on his spell going down by 4 in that log. If I had money. n/t

He may have improved, but he also lost %. I'd put money on his spell going down by 4 in that log. If I had money. n/t:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Macheath(VIP) on November 12, 2000 at 21:14:12:

In Reply to: I think he means improving and not losing a percentage. n/t posted by Chalupah on November 12, 2000 at 19:09:56:

> > > The man-at-arms has arrived.

> > > <100%hp 97%m 14%mv> c bli 2.
> > > c bli 2.
> > > c bli 2.
> > > c bli 2.
> > > c bli 2.
> > > c bli 2.
> > > c bli 2.
> > > You are blinded!
> > > You have become better at blindness!
> > > save
> > > wo

> > > That's definitely not right.

> > You weren't targetting the soldier, you were targetting the second thing in the room. When the man-at-arms arrived, the second target became you. That's why you blinded yourself.

Follow Ups:

More likely he lost 34% if he didn't learn any more and the guard didn't leave. Eric Prothero 20:38:19 11/13/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > > > The man-at-arms has arrived. > > > > <100%hp 97%m 14%mv> c bli 2. > > > > c bli 2. > > > > c bli 2. > > > > c bli 2. > > > > c bli 2. > > > > c bli 2. > > > > c bli 2. > > > > You are blinded! > > > > You have become better at blindness! > > > > save > > > > wo > > > > That's definitely not right. > > > You weren't targetting the soldier, you were targetting the second thing in the room. When the man-at-arms arrived, the second target became you. That's why you blinded yourself.