Posted by PINI on November 29, 2000 at 22:47:00:
In Reply to: But that wasn't my question... posted by Isildur on November 29, 2000 at 22:21:46:
> Me: > They are both neither right nor wrong its just a point of view, is the mechanics of the game, Imortals want that their is a fight between them so we just give them a fight. Masters point of view. Sylvans point of view. In other words Transmutters and Invokers can find a way to help nature with their magic, like transmutter helping the forest animals be stronger and can defend themselves, and an invoker can shield a tree to make it more resistant. But naither necros nor conjurers can help nature in any means. So once again there is no write or wrong. Im afraid not a clue. I would gues it doesnt why would it? But then again why would nature and magic fight...
> So, in regards to invocation and transmutation, are those magical forces in opposition to nature or not? It would seem that either the Tower or the Glade is completely mistaken.
> You:
> In the game Ask a sylvan their point if view, Im sure most of them can tell you why conjurers and necros are a NO for sylvans and why Invokers and Transmutter can manage to get in.
> My question is concerning how the Masters and Sylvan can both be right in the respective opinions of invocation and transmutation. The Masters feel these, just like any other magic, are in opposition to nature. The Sylvan, guardians of nature, feel they are perfectly alright. Who is right?
Nature is what stops magic, if it wasnt for it magic would be unstopable. (all Magic)
Necros and Conjurers magics are wrong becouse they alter nature as it is normally. And masters are wrong becouse they want to destroy nature.
> (btw, any thoughts on the health thing?)