Posted by woops, sorry about that, please delete one of them on December 8, 2000 at 14:33:58:
In Reply to: Cabal politics posted by Borimor the Great on December 8, 2000 at 14:32:59:
> Now, please disregard all comments if I am wrong, I have never been in any cabals, never really wanted to be in any, except scarab of course but I'm still working on my second unseccesful attempt. I believe that the imms should have a very limited role in the politics. They should not be the ones to kick players out of cabals, ever. Unless there is a cheating thing going on. They should leave everything up to the mortlas. I guess the best example of this I can think of is the Empire. If I'm not mistaken, and I could be, immortals often are the ones doing the anethemaing. As soon as they see the smallest problem, perhaps a rebellion in the works? they anethema the player instantly so their precious Empire doesn't fall apart. If the imms are seeking to make this game more lifelike, they need to let these things play out. Juilius Caesar had no idea that he was being betrayed, and all of the sudden BAM! he got backstabbed by Brutus. That kind of thing never happens, and in the time period that this game portrays, these things happened all of the time. I'm just rambling on really, but, go ahead, flame at me for a while. > Oh yeah, I think Carrion Fields could use legions, and city politics, like in Elysium, if anyone is really interested, I will elaborate.