Re: horse.

Re: horse.:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by downlow on December 9, 2000 at 10:32:20:

In Reply to: horse. posted by smirk on December 9, 2000 at 08:16:12:

> 1) It is also against CF rules, or at least considered cheating and bad form to intentionally let people know *cough challen*. I wasnt actually speculating, I was saying that a few people had already connected the two, and if it was true it was bad form.

spec·u·late
-To engage in a course of reasoning often based on inconclusive evidence. To assume to be true without conclusive evidence.

You sure that's not what you did?

> 5) Once again, The point of the post was NOT "Look everyone, I think this is happening". It was "Look dude, *if* you are doing this it is sad".

Prove it.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > 1) It is also against CF rules, or at least considered cheating and bad form to intentionally let people know cough challen. I wasnt actually speculating, I was saying that a few people had already connected the two, and if it was true it was bad form. > spec·u·late > -To engage in a course of reasoning often based on inconclusive evidence. To assume to be true without conclusive evidence. > > You sure that's not what you did? > > > 5) Once again, The point of the post was NOT "Look everyone, I think this is happening". It was "Look dude, if you are doing this it is sad". > Prove it. > dl