Posted by sparky on December 15, 2000 at 15:16:27:
In Reply to: Re: I think what he's saying is... posted by Nepenthe(IMM) on December 15, 2000 at 10:53:59:
> It absolutely is more difficult to have very high morale while alone, but it's also more difficult to have very low morale while alone. Say I have a ranger who is anti-social. His morale is actually higher if the only people around him are the squirrels and the birds. And he loves rain - he feels it cleanses the soul and thus, poor weather also raises his morale. Then being alone, wouldn't it be easier for him to have a high morale, and vice-versa? I guess my point is that not all characters conform to the small spattering of "morale guidelines" that we've been given. Who knows, you probably have already taken something like this into account...but it IS something to think about. It's the main reason that most people have a problem with morale - you are telling us how our character feels, when in SOME circumstances (certainly not all, or even most) the character would actually feel differently than his morale is letting on. Any comments on the anti-social sphere storms ranger example?