> 1. Staunchly pro-life. <br> <br>He's staunchly pro-life but more important he's staunchly *state control*. He isn't in favor of it being decided on the Federal level, he wants Roe v Wade overturned so it goes back to the states to decide. <br> <br>Anyone who genuinely agrees with small government should want this. Utilizing the federal government to espouse one viewpoint while silencing another, whether that be pro-life or pro-choice is equally "wrong" in the eyes of someone who supports state power. <br> <br>#2 is true, but honestly that's also because it just isn't given a lot of air time. Objectively speaking, the failure of our education system is neither a mystery nor a secret. If you think our current school system is the best thing since sliced bread you need to take a better look at it. If this was a topic of serious discussion, people would and they'd see that it doesn't necessarily have to be an issue of schools going away. It could just be an issue of who should run them.