I agree with you on the principles..

October 25, 2007 06:25PM
It does seem like the UK and America have been pushing towards anti-smoking policies with the smoking bans in clubs/pubs etc. in some areas. God forbid they actually ban smoking entirely, it would be like 1920s prohibition all over again. Plus, it would raise unemployment. I agree with you completely on freedom though and as for premature death, the world is heading for massive overpopulation in some areas anyhow.
Subject Author Views Posted

More evils from the Democrats.

Death_Claw 853 October 25, 2007 02:21PM

I'm starting to question if Smoking reduces life expectancy.

Pro 499 October 25, 2007 03:34PM

Smoking may not reduce life expectancy directly..

Istirith 500 October 25, 2007 03:51PM

Maybe we should all agree that cigarettes are a choice.

Death_Claw 477 October 25, 2007 05:16PM

Bear in mind here's one of the supporters of this bill.

Death_Claw 533 October 25, 2007 05:45PM

I agree with you on the principles..

Istirith 437 October 25, 2007 06:25PM

Yeah, I'm with you on that one.

Death_Claw 463 October 25, 2007 07:08PM

Enviroment without cigarette smoke should also be a choise.

DurNominator 454 October 25, 2007 09:11PM

What does that have to do with what I'm saying?

Death_Claw 483 October 26, 2007 04:07AM

Did you know that....

AA 522 October 26, 2007 05:24AM

Smoking is already prohibited in public indoor facilities here.

DurNominator 471 October 26, 2007 08:45AM

Its not even that.

Death_Claw 462 October 25, 2007 05:13PM

I'm with you. I was just saying. Sorry to stray. n/t

Pro 519 October 25, 2007 06:09PM

Re: Its not even that.

Enbuergo 503 October 25, 2007 06:49PM

Re: Its not even that.

Death_Claw 486 October 25, 2007 07:03PM

Uhm, what?(nt)

Cenatar 484 October 25, 2007 09:33PM

Why are you laying cigarette taxes at the feet of the Democrats?

Balrahd 474 October 25, 2007 10:05PM

Real ones don't.

Death_Claw 464 October 26, 2007 04:02AM

My point is, this isn't the only "selective" cigarette tax out there.

Balrahd 500 October 26, 2007 07:25AM

That's fine.

Death_Claw 499 October 26, 2007 07:32AM

Because what you implied is not restricted to this one bill.

Balrahd 537 October 26, 2007 12:18PM

You interpret an implication based on your heuristic disposition.

Death_Claw 557 October 26, 2007 12:25PM

God, fox news.. do you at least acknowledge that they lie, pretty often? ~

Chalupah 552 October 26, 2007 05:32AM

Fine. Choose any other news source you want.

Death_Claw 471 October 26, 2007 06:38AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 58
Record Number of Users: 5 November 04, 2022
Record Number of Guests: 358 August 31, 2022