Trip VS Legsweep is easy

Guy
February 04, 2008 07:17AM
Legsweep is mildly more efficient, and in a situation where someone has spammed themselves out, its downright deadly.

Trip lag itself is identical to legsweep.
A landed trip is 1.9 for them and 2.0 for you
So they will ALWAYS get exactly 1 command in which your goal is to make that one command
directional.
A missed trip is 1.5? 1.6? for you and obviously 0 for them, this decimal lag means that you can miss 1 trip and only take one round of combat before you can land another.
However if you do something like gutshot which is 2 rounds your missed trip could possibly take you 2 rounds to recover from due to the way the mud rounds commands not to mention the additional varience in ping.
Subject Author Posted

spear spec question

sopa February 02, 2008 07:57AM

afaik lags like pincer. txt

Isildur(VIP) February 02, 2008 08:04AM

I'm pretty sure pincer lag is just a wee bit less than trip lag. Appeared that way for me when I played Vederath atleast ~

Krilcov February 02, 2008 03:39PM

thanks

sopa February 02, 2008 08:09AM

One more question

sopa February 02, 2008 02:15PM

Trip VS Legsweep is easy

Guy February 04, 2008 07:17AM

Can gnome legsweep a giant? nt

DurNominator(VIP) February 04, 2008 12:41PM

Yes. Legsweep is not size dependant. ~

_Magus_ February 04, 2008 01:59PM

Trip versus Legsweep.

Yhorian(VIP) February 02, 2008 03:15PM

Re: Trip versus Legsweep.

Isildur(VIP) February 02, 2008 04:51PM

I thought trip lag for the tripper was 1.5 rounds, actually. NT

baekthestorm February 02, 2008 06:33PM

Re: I thought trip lag for the tripper was 1.5 rounds, actually. NT

Isildur(VIP) February 03, 2008 04:58AM

That's almost right. It's 1.5, so if you did it close to the previous round you'll get a shot before the next. nt

Yhorian(VIP) February 03, 2008 05:00AM

Pretty sure that trip is one full round of lag if missed.

The Forsaken(VIP) February 03, 2008 10:00AM

I may take this back. Let me think about it. nt

The Forsaken(VIP) February 03, 2008 10:21AM

That doesn't make sense. txt

Isildur(VIP) February 03, 2008 05:39AM

IIRC 1,5 rounds would be 2 rounds, 1 round, 2 rounds, 1 round.. nt

DurNominator(VIP) February 03, 2008 11:23PM

Okay, work in pulses then. Here's my work through:

Yhorian(VIP) February 03, 2008 05:54AM

Rather than arbitrarily assigning it some number of pulses lag...

Death_Claw February 03, 2008 12:39PM

There is an easy way to test:

Balrahd(VIP) February 03, 2008 08:57PM

You are missing the point behind my post.

Death_Claw February 04, 2008 03:51AM

It's true we have no exact knowledge

elmeri February 04, 2008 12:50PM

Except that this is very exactly correct.

elmeri February 03, 2008 03:19PM

15 pulses is exactly correct? Sounds like a guess/approximation. n/t

Death_Claw February 03, 2008 03:36PM

Did some testing. txt

Isildur(VIP) February 03, 2008 06:23PM

This is true, It's about 1 round lag for legsweep, 1.5 for a missed trip. nt

Yhorian(VIP) February 03, 2008 01:26AM

Sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't. ~

Krilcov February 02, 2008 05:25PM



Sorry, you do not have permission to post/reply in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 111
Record Number of Users: 5 November 04, 2022
Record Number of Guests: 358 August 31, 2022