IMO it's 50/50 if both are only using their inherent dam redux.

Balrahd(VIP)

October 11, 2009 10:07PM

Moderator
Registered: 16 years ago
Posts: 1,019

I don't think you can sit there and say one side is clearly favored over the other.

But you stack on non-wand protections (stoneskin, aura, shield, protection) and start adding in specialized tactics and it starts swaying one direction over the other.

Reply Quote

RSS

Subject	Author	Posted
Sleeks...	shane	October 11, 2009 08:49AM
Why are sleeks so sought after?	pendragon_surtr	October 11, 2009 08:22PM
The thing about non-sleek wands	_Magus_	October 11, 2009 09:45PM
In most cases it respawns within 24 ticks. Like a sleek. ntnt	crafteddeception	October 12, 2009 07:39AM
Longer duration, more charges, always in~	torak	October 11, 2009 08:35PM
The problem as far as I see it	NbM	October 11, 2009 03:56PM
YEY! 101st location checked and amber found! 2 wands! Yey! (110hours played) n/t	deriveh	October 11, 2009 01:43PM
not to be a dick... because I havent played in a while and dont know... but...	GreenLantern	October 14, 2009 12:47PM
i'm going to play a mage next, and post my hour count each time i find a sleek. nt	Isildur(VIP)	October 11, 2009 03:52PM
Just found my char's first tonight..	bell	October 11, 2009 07:13PM
more info on what i'm going to do: txt	Isildur(VIP)	October 12, 2009 02:00PM
This has been suggested 10-15 times from what I can remember. Imms say NO. n/t	deriveh	October 11, 2009 12:07PM
Would you say the mage classes are unplayable without ABS? nt	Nian	October 11, 2009 10:18AM
They will be boring as hell without it. n/t	dervish	October 11, 2009 10:22AM
A theoretical exercise ...	Nian	October 11, 2009 10:29AM
Re: A theoretical exercise ...	Isildur(VIP)	October 12, 2009 06:37AM
Quaff lag and zap lag are vastly different. Who is more screwed caught by suprise? ntnt	crafteddeception	October 12, 2009 07:46AM
Re: Quaff lag and zap lag are vastly different. Who is more screwed caught by suprise? ntnt	Isildur(VIP)	October 12, 2009 08:03AM
IMO it's 50/50 if both are only using their inherent dam redux.	Balrahd(VIP)	October 11, 2009 10:07PM
the mage is charred bread. n/t	vortex_magus	October 11, 2009 05:28PM
The mage is toast. nt.	Jib	October 11, 2009 10:52AM
Eh. That depends entirely on what warrior, and what kind of mage. nt	Java	October 11, 2009 11:09AM
The mage is toast if the warrior is dagger spec or the mage is anything but transmuter or evil conjurer. nt	Scrimbul	October 11, 2009 11:15AM
Transmuter will be toast as well. Period. (n/t)	dervish	October 11, 2009 07:13PM
Okay.. but replace transmuter with lich or charged-up AP.	Jib	October 11, 2009 11:40AM
Gee... you mean they'd have to use tactics to win? How awful. (n/t)	randomthinker	October 11, 2009 11:42AM
I think we're talking about a different discussion. n/t.	Jib	October 11, 2009 07:21PM
Hit and run is part of the game	Nian	October 11, 2009 11:42AM
So... you agree completely with what I said? nt	Java	October 11, 2009 11:21AM
I wasn't disagreeing. Who do you think I am, Graatch? nt	Scrimbul	October 11, 2009 11:49AM
So the conclusion you both seem to make	Nian	October 11, 2009 12:01PM
Because people who complain about Aura and Barrier wands aren't looking to just be "competitive" 1 v 1.	Balrahd(VIP)	October 11, 2009 03:48PM
bullshit.	Cosimo	October 11, 2009 08:37PM
It's more complicated than PK stats will reveal.	Balrahd(VIP)	October 11, 2009 09:58PM
Re: It's more complicated than PK stats will reveal.	Cosimo	October 12, 2009 10:52PM
You just said exactly what I've been thinking while reading all the shit people have been talking about. ~	_Magus_	October 11, 2009 04:07PM
Because all that goes out the window as soon as the warrior hits 50 damroll usually. nt	Scrimbul	October 11, 2009 02:22PM
About as boring as it is to fight them when they have it? nt	Java	October 11, 2009 10:23AM
I like Zulg's idea:	TheBard	October 11, 2009 09:19AM
Mages? Unbalanced? OH NOES!!! All you mage players cant quit bitching, and try out an orc -text-	Stevers	October 11, 2009 04:30PM
I proposed this idea on the original thread and it was met with crickets :( NT	KennyPowers	October 11, 2009 12:14PM
If your feeling brave:	TheBard	October 11, 2009 12:56PM
I like that idea too	NbM	October 11, 2009 09:58AM
Definitely agree with this.	istirith	October 11, 2009 11:42AM
Imms don't want sleeks to be EASY to find. That's the entire disconnect. nt	Java	October 11, 2009 08:54AM
Re: Imms don't want sleeks to be EASY to find. That's the entire disconnect. nt	stlucian2debone	October 11, 2009 09:04AM
Breaking it worse isn't the answer. Cme up with a GOOD idea, and they'll listen. nt	Java	October 11, 2009 09:25AM
And they're right. n/t	alansmithee	October 11, 2009 09:04AM

Sorry, you do not have permission to post/reply in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 114

Record Number of Users: 5 November 04, 2022

Record Number of Guests: 358 August 31, 2022

Moderators: Isildur, Gabe, The Forsaken