1. Thanks, but no, I'm not. 2. The precedent has already been set, but only the IMMs follow it.

October 30, 2009 02:41PM
Other than that, I read your post twice now and although it's interesting, I still don't understand how you disagree with me. Here's what I'm getting:

Me: Anathema for breaking imperial law. Demote for stupid stuff. Demotion is not an effective deterrant to breaking imperial law, especially in a cabal known for its OOC cliques.
You: I demoted Jalim for stupid stuff.

I guess I agree with you that not being able to use your Imperial as a storage character is a "drawback." I don't see how that is on the same level as "Don't attack Goods and Neutrals" and "Don't use magic or communes" and "Don't attack in cities" but you're right, it is a drawback.

But you're wrong, anathema does not give you a betrayer vuln. Imperial vengeance is obviously a special case.
Subject Author Posted

AP's

madcap October 29, 2009 03:17PM

Heh, now I know name of your char~

Illiet October 29, 2009 05:42PM

And your point is? (n/t)

madcap October 29, 2009 05:51PM

Re: AP's

madcap October 29, 2009 03:35PM

Re: AP's

Isildur(VIP) October 29, 2009 03:53PM

Re: AP's

madcap October 29, 2009 04:00PM

Also worth to mention

Illiet October 29, 2009 05:50PM

Cause Imperials ALWAYS follow that rule? Seriously? nt

Java October 29, 2009 06:02PM

Almost always

Illiet October 29, 2009 06:09PM

Actually, I'm commenting on them as I'm a serial Imperial enemy.

Java October 29, 2009 06:45PM

Then you probably know that

Illiet October 29, 2009 06:50PM

Just look at Kjrorh's pbf

Balrahd(VIP) October 29, 2009 08:27PM

Re: Just look at Kjrorh's pbf

Flipside Oreo October 30, 2009 05:34AM

Imperial Law is greater than Orderly Evil, imo. nt

The Forsaken(VIP) October 30, 2009 07:54AM

Re: Just look at Kjrorh's pbf

Isildur(VIP) October 30, 2009 07:21AM

The unstated, but key element here.

alansmithee October 30, 2009 07:55AM

Not necessarily...

Moligant October 30, 2009 11:33AM

Re: Just look at Kjrorh's pbf

Illiet October 29, 2009 08:50PM

That doesn't matter.

Java October 30, 2009 10:24AM

Re: Just look at Kjrorh's pbf

Balrahd(VIP) October 30, 2009 08:06AM

I disagree.

Scrimbul October 30, 2009 10:27AM

Re: I disagree.

Balrahd(VIP) October 30, 2009 11:32AM

Emperor spot's free. Feel free to go set this precedent. You're more than capable.

Scrimbul October 30, 2009 12:44PM

1. Thanks, but no, I'm not. 2. The precedent has already been set, but only the IMMs follow it.

Balrahd(VIP) October 30, 2009 02:41PM

I almost made Emperor. The only reason I did not make emperor is I pretty much let Tarleton have it when I figured out too late that the man I had picked for Shadow Lord as Jalim's replacement was an idiot.

Scrimbul October 30, 2009 09:25PM

Why would I know that?

Java October 29, 2009 06:57PM

Re: Why would I know that?

Illiet October 29, 2009 07:02PM

Java played an imperial to level 25 then deleted in boredom because he didn't have sanc and wrath. It's not your fault he keeps provoking noob Imperials. Drop it. nt

Scrimbul October 29, 2009 07:49PM

Do you even know what the argument is?

Java October 30, 2009 10:35AM

I'm with you halfway.

Scrimbul October 30, 2009 12:49PM

Re: AP's

Isildur(VIP) October 29, 2009 05:07PM

There's a way to do it. Doubt he's able.

The Forsaken(VIP) October 29, 2009 03:38PM

Post a log and I will show you where you're crazy. -nt-

Mek October 29, 2009 03:31PM



Sorry, you do not have permission to post/reply in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 91
Record Number of Users: 5 November 04, 2022
Record Number of Guests: 358 August 31, 2022