"The only other cabal that would match the stats he put forth is Empire, and the reasons would be the same, if you couldn't get a Scion you'd take an Imperial. You know what he meant, you're just playing too many solo murder-druids and shifters to even look at the situation as a whole."
You're trying to generalize that just because someone is a Scion, they are a better oppurtunity as a pvp ally, and that's just as rightous as saying all black people steal. high numbers, low numbers, is irrelevant because the cabals are rarely full as it is, and even if so, RP will get someone a hell of a lot fucking farther than abs and a nightwalker.
Speaking of which, scions were some of my easiest kills with my last few characters, so everything your little butt buddy is preaching pretty much goes down the toilet.
As an aside, I havent played a druid OR shifter for at least a year if not more. You personally I thought a little bit more perceptive and mature than to stoop to the level of a pissed of baby saying I only play druids an shifters because of the 2 druids I EVER played raped your ass so bad you can't get over it, that or the ONE gnome shifter I played that changed aligns, ALSO raped your ass so hard pvp you cant get over it.
"It's a reputation thing. If you disagree with the rep of Scion mages and healers, then fine, you can be on the wrong end of a Scion who is hellbent on killing you when the entire range *isn't* on his ass."
No, it's not. It's one person saying that just because Scion is a low member cabal, they're Leet, when in actuality it's just a matter of putting a little bit more effort into a character than disarm spam and being able to roleplay your way out of a paper bag. On top of that, spitting out misinfo to attempt to gain some type of foothold in an irrelevent argument that I merely threw in my two cents on, chaps my ass. It's people and posts like you though, probably chap it even more, stupid ass.