Right and wrong requires an objective basis to make a determination. It's easy to say something is right or wrong under XYZ set of principles, but to say anything is inherently right or wrong requires a purely objective basis which does not exist. (does that mean saying something is objectively right or wrong is therefore the only thing that can ever be wrong?)
I can't think of many inherent truths that can be used to definitively adjudicate whether something is right or wrong on an objective basis.
Most of these principles stem from religion, and that as a basis of authority is not really compelling to me. That which is rooted in people should always be treated with skepticism.
I have my own views on what I consider to be right and wrong, but these are entirely my own and do not reflect some overarching truth about the world.
Too often whether something is right or wrong is tied to a code of laws which defines an act as legal or illegal.
The foundation of the law may be questionable and it's debatable whether a law is right or wrong, but in society you are generally bound by these principles as they will be enforced upon you whether you agree with them or view them as right or wrong.
The fact that I may disagree about the morality of something does not change the legality of it though, and society is generally going to enforce those laws upon me with or without my consent.
However, you'd have to concede societies in general do have consistent views on things it views as good and bad, which are equated to right and wrong.
Take Communism and Capitalism.
Two societies may differ on which is a good and bad approach, and to that extent they both exist as right and wrong to the respective societies.
Neither Communism or Capitalism are right or wrong, they just exist and societal views will accept or reject them and judge them on that basis as right or wrong. The bias of a society that picks one as good and right does not invalidate or condemn the other as bad and wrong though.
It's probably fair to say that which is universally and consistently accepted or rejected by all societies across all time as good and bad could be considered right or wrong, but these are pretty hard to come by. It'd be whatever fundamental human rights there are, if any can be said to exist at all.
All pointless philosophy though.