Ok..

December 13, 2007 09:05PM
I haven't read the entire Mitchell Report.. I basically just skimmed it looking at the names implicated. Have you read it verbatim? I doubt it.. cause it's freakin 400 pages long. So I can't confirm or deny if there was any new info on Bonds in it. But that isn't even relevant.

Anyway, the indictment is because they think Barry Bonds lied to the Grand Jury. In short, they think he used steroids intentionally and often, contrary to his testimony.

The Mitchell Report is an investigation commissioned by Bud Selig and MLB. It is not the be all and end all investigation of every Major League ballplayer who has used. And it is not the sum of the entire evidence against Bonds. It is the sum of the evidence gathered by Mitchell, who was significantly handicapped in his ability to gather info. (He couldn't subpoena, for example, any MLB players to provide information. Those that did, did so by their own personal choice.. and against strong urging by the Player's Union). It wasn't a criminal investigation. Mitchell had no real authority.

In short, the Mitchell Report does not prove anyone innocent. It doesn't lift the suspicion off of anyone. It doesn't clear anyone's name. It only provides a tiny glimpse into a much bigger problem.
Subject Author Posted

I knew Gagne and Clemens were juicing! nt

Lokain December 13, 2007 10:17AM

Sad but true

hopelessdwarf December 13, 2007 12:04PM

And strangely NO EVIDENCE BONDS LIED TO THE GRAND JURY.

Sam December 13, 2007 10:57AM

What are you talking about Barry Juice Bonds is on the list too. ~

happyorb December 13, 2007 12:30PM

Of course he is. HE ADMITTED AS MUCH TO THE GRAND JURY.

Sam December 13, 2007 04:24PM

Ok..

Java December 13, 2007 09:05PM

Once again, this is not about Bonds, this about EVERYONE ELSE.

Sam December 13, 2007 10:33PM

Why leave him alone?

The Forsaken(VIP) December 14, 2007 05:13AM

That's AA's problem

Lokain December 14, 2007 08:23AM

Umm, because..

Java December 15, 2007 12:59AM

Re: Umm, because..

Lokain December 15, 2007 01:51AM

Because..

Java December 15, 2007 02:02AM

Getting rid of any individual will not prove or solve anything

Lokain December 15, 2007 02:11AM

Didn't I specifically say it wouldn't fix the problem?

Java December 15, 2007 02:41AM

Re: Didn't I specifically say it wouldn't fix the problem?

Lokain December 15, 2007 02:56AM

He is right though. Just wrong person. Five letters though. NT

Sam December 15, 2007 02:33AM

To be fair, Selig has done a LOT of good for the game too.

Java December 15, 2007 02:51AM

A lot? I can think of only 1.

Lokain December 15, 2007 02:57AM

Ok...

Java December 15, 2007 04:18AM

I think interleague is one of the worst additions to the game

Lokain December 15, 2007 11:27AM

Innocent until proven guilty my man.

Sam December 15, 2007 01:36AM

The evidence is out there..

Java December 15, 2007 02:06AM

I think they can't prove his guilt. So therefore, he's innocent. That good enough for you? NT

Sam December 15, 2007 02:32AM

Exactly. Thanks man. NT

Sam December 14, 2007 09:33AM

Oh, see.

The Forsaken(VIP) December 14, 2007 08:29AM

Okay but I think you'd agree

Lokain December 14, 2007 08:47AM

How is that unjust?

Java December 15, 2007 12:53AM

It's not unjust to punish Bonds or focus on him

ExPaladin(VIP) December 15, 2007 01:34AM

I'm not sure I believe that the general concensus is that its all Bond's fault. n/t

Death_Claw December 15, 2007 08:22PM



Sorry, you do not have permission to post/reply in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 85
Record Number of Users: 5 November 04, 2022
Record Number of Guests: 358 August 31, 2022