You're breaking rule #7 harder than anyone can break rule #7 and you're a moderator.

You've broken that rule yourself countless of times with your trolling and lack of manners. Rule 7 is a line drawn in water and we VIPs are the one who deem what is against it and what is not.

I think the funniest thing is that you're completely wrong. I was a contemporary of Josiah, and he cited one of my characters as an example for some point he was making.

The second point in the theory had a word probably. I posted it here, giving you an option to explain the reasoning. Why did you first claim that you hadn't heard of Josiah in that post you edited it out from (as you now claim that he was a contemporary)?

I can't even understand how or why you'd twist that to mean something else.

It is speculation. The whole point of checking it out arises from your behaviour on the boards. Josiah was a douchebag and you've been acting like a douchebag, so people think of him when they see your rude posts.

Getting back to the spirit of rule #7, let's look at the intent and result of your accusation.

What could be your intent? Your intent was clearly to create a flamewar against a board user.

His intent was to defend Java against your flaming and bashing. The spirit of rule #7 is no inane trolling and needless douchebaggery.

What was the result? A flamewar against a board user.

What device did you use to incite the flamewar? Not a contrary opinion. Not a particular topic. You used an identity.

Rule #7.

You started the thread, so look in the mirror for guilty parties. The whole point of this thread is to talk about infi = Josiah claims, is it not? I have not noticed you previously stating not being Josiah before this thread. In fact, I brought the theory with its potential hole well pointed out for you to confirm or deny.