There's no need to get defensive.

January 03, 2008 08:43AM
I'm just suggesting as a matter of ethics its simpler to make a blanket decision now and avoid headaches for everyone down the line. We're all accustomed to post deletions, why open the door to more annoying and "gray area" discussions? Soon it'll be "why was my post deleted and not edited?" or "Why did you edit this and not that?" Or people just re-editing their posts after the fact.

I'm not personally slamming what you did in Pro's thread but I'm suggesting its a better idea to just delete the post or leave it alone, both ethically and practically speaking.
Subject Author Posted

Editing of posts by VIPs.

Death_Claw January 02, 2008 11:45AM

Cosign. NT

Batman January 03, 2008 02:06PM

As far as I'm aware, no one has ever claimed it has happened

daurwyn(VIP) January 03, 2008 07:37AM

I noticed it on Pro's thread below.

Death_Claw January 03, 2008 08:39AM

Hmm, you aren't thinking of my editing are you?

daurwyn January 07, 2008 02:53PM

And as soon as we mangle anyone's context, that'd be a very viable complaint. But we don't intend to. nt

Yhorian January 03, 2008 09:20AM

Fine but don't say I didn't warn you or complain about it later on when your good intentions backfire. n/t

Death_Claw January 03, 2008 09:23AM

I agree with Death_Claw

adam_gay January 02, 2008 05:00PM

Let's say that there's a big discussion following started by the thread.

DurNominator(VIP) January 03, 2008 03:00AM

Re: Let's say that there's a big discussion following started by the thread.

adam_gay January 03, 2008 04:05AM

What about logs as an alternative example?

Yhorian(VIP) January 03, 2008 05:30AM

Re: What about logs as an alternative example?

adam_gay January 03, 2008 07:10AM

How about you wait until we do edit someones ideas/views/experiences, then protest?

Yhorian(VIP) January 03, 2008 07:46AM

Re: How about you wait until we do edit someones ideas/views/experiences, then protest?

infi January 03, 2008 11:14AM

Misinfo. nt

Yhorian January 04, 2008 01:27AM

Re: How about you wait until we do edit someones ideas/views/experiences, then protest?

adam_gay January 03, 2008 09:47AM

I think it natural no one -wants- to be censored. But the silent majority understand its necessity.

Yhorian January 03, 2008 09:51AM

Re: I think it natural no one -wants- to be censored. But the silent majority understand its necessity.

adam_gay January 03, 2008 09:59AM

It's not a necessity, but it's a damn handy tool.

Yhorian January 03, 2008 10:06AM

Re: It's not a necessity, but it's a damn handy tool.

adam_gay January 03, 2008 11:50AM

Seconded and fwiw

Rogue January 02, 2008 05:32PM

Way to oversimplify

daurwyn(VIP) January 03, 2008 07:39AM

Re: Way to oversimplify

adam_gay January 03, 2008 09:54AM

I'd far prefer editing out the bad stuff from good posts. Ie, quest info from a pretty good rant on quests. nt

Yhorian(VIP) January 02, 2008 04:03PM

For what it's worth

DurNominator(VIP) January 02, 2008 12:16PM

You're missing the point, us regular folk won't know you guys changed our posts. War is Peace and Freedom is Slavery.~

happyorb January 02, 2008 12:56PM

Are you sure it doesn't say that it was edited by someone? nt

The Forsaken(VIP) January 02, 2008 01:06PM

On the pro post below "I know and I wish"

Derexal January 02, 2008 02:09PM

If I had deleted the entire post, you'd all just throw a hissy fit on over-censoring.

Yhorian(VIP) January 02, 2008 04:32PM

There's no need to get defensive.

Death_Claw January 03, 2008 08:43AM

My censored version on what it read before

DurNominator(VIP) January 02, 2008 02:25PM

Personally I am in favor for nuking the post.

Derexal January 02, 2008 02:28PM

Yeah, I agree with Dexiekins.

vladamir January 04, 2008 08:59AM

Re: For what it's worth

Splntrd January 02, 2008 12:53PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 30
Record Number of Users: 59 October 25, 2015
Record Number of Guests: 341 February 12, 2018