And as soon as we mangle anyone's context, that'd be a very viable complaint. But we don't intend to. nt

Yhorian

January 03, 2008 09:20AM

Registered: 16 years ago
Posts: 3,024

nt

Yhorian

Reply Quote

RSS

Subject	Author	Posted
Editing of posts by VIPs.	Death_Claw	January 02, 2008 11:45AM
Cosign. NT	Batman	January 03, 2008 02:06PM
As far as I'm aware, no one has ever claimed it has happened	daurwyn(VIP)	January 03, 2008 07:37AM
I noticed it on Pro's thread below.	Death_Claw	January 03, 2008 08:39AM
Hmm, you aren't thinking of my editing are you?	daurwyn	January 07, 2008 02:53PM
And as soon as we mangle anyone's context, that'd be a very viable complaint. But we don't intend to. nt	Yhorian	January 03, 2008 09:20AM
Fine but don't say I didn't warn you or complain about it later on when your good intentions backfire. n/t	Death_Claw	January 03, 2008 09:23AM
I agree with Death_Claw	adam_gay	January 02, 2008 05:00PM
Let's say that there's a big discussion following started by the thread.	DurNominator(VIP)	January 03, 2008 03:00AM
Re: Let's say that there's a big discussion following started by the thread.	adam_gay	January 03, 2008 04:05AM
What about logs as an alternative example?	Yhorian(VIP)	January 03, 2008 05:30AM
Re: What about logs as an alternative example?	adam_gay	January 03, 2008 07:10AM
How about you wait until we do edit someones ideas/views/experiences, then protest?	Yhorian(VIP)	January 03, 2008 07:46AM
Re: How about you wait until we do edit someones ideas/views/experiences, then protest?	infi	January 03, 2008 11:14AM
Misinfo. nt	Yhorian	January 04, 2008 01:27AM
Re: How about you wait until we do edit someones ideas/views/experiences, then protest?	adam_gay	January 03, 2008 09:47AM
I think it natural no one -wants- to be censored. But the silent majority understand its necessity.	Yhorian	January 03, 2008 09:51AM
Re: I think it natural no one -wants- to be censored. But the silent majority understand its necessity.	adam_gay	January 03, 2008 09:59AM
It's not a necessity, but it's a damn handy tool.	Yhorian	January 03, 2008 10:06AM
Re: It's not a necessity, but it's a damn handy tool.	adam_gay	January 03, 2008 11:50AM
Seconded and fwiw	Rogue	January 02, 2008 05:32PM
Way to oversimplify	daurwyn(VIP)	January 03, 2008 07:39AM
Re: Way to oversimplify	adam_gay	January 03, 2008 09:54AM
I'd far prefer editing out the bad stuff from good posts. Ie, quest info from a pretty good rant on quests. nt	Yhorian(VIP)	January 02, 2008 04:03PM
For what it's worth	DurNominator(VIP)	January 02, 2008 12:16PM
You're missing the point, us regular folk won't know you guys changed our posts. War is Peace and Freedom is Slavery.~	happyorb	January 02, 2008 12:56PM
Are you sure it doesn't say that it was edited by someone? nt	The Forsaken(VIP)	January 02, 2008 01:06PM
On the pro post below "I know and I wish"	Derexal	January 02, 2008 02:09PM
If I had deleted the entire post, you'd all just throw a hissy fit on over-censoring.	Yhorian(VIP)	January 02, 2008 04:32PM
There's no need to get defensive.	Death_Claw	January 03, 2008 08:43AM
My censored version on what it read before	DurNominator(VIP)	January 02, 2008 02:25PM
Personally I am in favor for nuking the post.	Derexal	January 02, 2008 02:28PM
Yeah, I agree with Dexiekins.	vladamir	January 04, 2008 08:59AM
Re: For what it's worth	Splntrd	January 02, 2008 12:53PM

Sorry, you do not have permission to post/reply in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 41

Record Number of Users: 5 November 04, 2022

Record Number of Guests: 358 August 31, 2022