Point of contention #1
You think the name-theory-mechanic is quest information.

I don't understand how it could be interpreted this way.



Point of contention #2
You are moderating a public wiki. I applaud you for doing it, and I think you're doing a good job of it.

However,

I think you're over-moderating, and not being very subtle about letting your personal drama with me get in the way of responsible editting. You've editted every single contribution I've made, from the mundane to the extraordinary. From hacking my work up and spreading it all over to citing yourself on pages I initiated.


What's at stake.
The wiki itself. There's been a flurry of wiki activity since I started writing down pertinant & interesting information about conjurers on the wiki. Someone took up some of the format I initiated and used it to describe shapeshifters. It even looks like people are rolling more conjurers. The interest in the wiki, in the game and in the class is what we want. So, I think I'm doing something positive.

Censoring my tid-bits on how to get the familiar you want, sure. That's a discussion. Obviously we're on different sides of the fence, but I don't like seeing you muck with content on your own initiative. If people (not just you) agree that it's questy information, then I've no qualms about it being removed.

Ripping up my conjurer pages and removing demon tactics from pages about demons? What in the hell were you thinking? For the first time in wiki history you're dictating exactly what format and style information is to be presented, and you're mucking around in other people's content. How dare you. A wiki is a public entity. You have to respect the work of other people, and leave it alone. If you push any sort of "god" complex down peoples throats, they will refuse to contribute.

I think we all agree that if people refuse to contribute, the wiki suffers. I'm just asking for some etiquette.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 01/03/2008 09:10AM by infi.