YES CLEARLY IT WAS. (n/t)

Previous Message Next Message

Forum List Message List New Topic

Frosty

July 09, 2013 08:03PM

Registered: 14 years ago
Posts: 10,584

This message does not contain any text.

Reply Quote

RSS

Subject	Author	Posted
Can we get a rule update? Just to clear it up for people.. (n/t)	tesline	July 09, 2013 06:22PM
Rule update has been discussed.	DurNominator	July 09, 2013 07:34PM
Thank you. Those were the two that bothered me. We have had quite a few bans recently that clearly don't violate our current rules. I agree that they should of been banned but until there is actually a rule for it they shouldn't of been banned. (n/t)	tesline	July 09, 2013 07:49PM
Careful bra, careful.	Frosty	July 09, 2013 06:44PM
Just don't ask for clarification twice in a row.	satchmo	July 09, 2013 06:53PM
YES CLEARLY IT WAS. (n/t)	Frosty	July 09, 2013 08:03PM
YOU CAN'T TYPE IN CAPS. (n/t)	tesline	July 09, 2013 06:54PM
Somebody must be looking for rule 3. :P	satchmo	July 09, 2013 06:55PM
Rule Number 1.	satchmo	July 09, 2013 06:30PM
Rule number 2 we don't talk about qhcf. rule 3 is banhammer. (n/t)	tesline	July 09, 2013 06:38PM
Well at least that's all cleared up! (n/t)	satchmo	July 09, 2013 06:44PM

Sorry, you do not have permission to post/reply in this forum.