I also only target people that deserve it, when they deserve it. He isn't "just helping" you here. His main intent is to insult you. He also has spent many posts insulting people that post on this forum who don't play the game.
It's all about just desserts Zheeser. Sometimes you deserve them yourself. So you get what we had here last week. Which is the way he wants it.
I've never been obtuse or wrong in my life. I'm 100% accurate and correct in all that I say and do. Some people, like you and Asker, are obviously jealous but I don't hate you for it.
Don't think I can spell it out any clearer.
EDIT: Actually, I take that back. I'm not sorry. You yourself said you wouldn't do it with your paladin. You clearly see a distinction. You're just being obtuse for the sake of argument.
By punishment, I more or less meant someone saying "Hey, don't do that"
Though there is no shortage of death threads where people freak out and delete over being told "Hey, don't do that" so I called it punishment :D
They kind of can't really, so I understand. It's one of those things players will toe the line on for the sake of abuse if you ever put hard-and-fast rules on it. Also, since a current character is using that tactic right now and it (presumably) hasn't been punished, it would look bad if you then punish them for a discussion that took place OOC.
Lame reasons, I agree, but I unde
QuoteMurphy
Consider this little example:
An Immortal added 250 exp for: For giving gold coins to a beggar that caught his plague, and asked him to go to the healer.
Do you think I expected the mob to actually go heal his plague? No, in fact I am fairly sure it still died from the plague some 30 ticks later. Does it mean I have to roleplay as if they died?
No, you don't have to roleplay
It's there as a soulless husk with hp and a couple skills. AKA a meat shield.
As opposed to, what I think you think I mean, a big hp buffer like a necro wall.
Instead of playing to the game and accepting the limitations of the medium, you are arguing for throwing the baby out with the bath water and forsaking the spirit of the game.
You treat NPCs as much like PCs as you can up until the point you can't because of the limitations of the medium. You also have to account for the fact that at any moment an NPC can become essentially a PC by virtue
Glad you are at least now adding some thought and substance to what you're trying to argue though. Of course, you remain absolutely and factually incorrect, but I know I can't sway you on that. Move along.
Since it's clearly your first time here, I thought I would let you know that this is a fantasy world within which many rules may seem arbitrary. For the most part, these are designed to ease the burdern on the players since game masters cannot be present 100% of the time to take the place of mobs. There is also a few special rules that apply to PCs only in our world for the sake of creating
I kid.
I see where you're coming from, but am pretty convinced you're wrong in CF terms. There are very clear definitions of morality and ethos in the helpfiles. Neutrality is never an indication of guilt unless you have witnessed an action that sways evil. Even then, they have not been judged by the gods to be evil. Ultimately the gods decide who is innocent and who isn't. A re
1. Live to be the guiding light for all to follow and look towards.
Killing neutrals is not living to be a guiding light. It's murdering innocents (EDIT: To add, if not innocent, at least beyond your ability to determine guilt outside of witnessing an evil deed), unless they are actively engaged in something that sways evil. In this case it's even worse because by summoning the neutr