Whereas only a handful of classes have access to a protective shield equivalent to avoid bash.
10 classes can get class bash protection
with enlarge reduce, someone 1-2 sizes naturally bigger/smaller could NEVER bash you if you use it right.
Look. Only a handful of very skilled players can manage to get lightning control. ANY ONE OF THOSE very skilled players, if they were playing a gi
And the fact of the matter is, if you want to be Ravon, Niheriva, Victoria, Cabdru, Drucyrus, Jhyrb, any lich, or whoever else, you need to know where these things are or be able to find them quickly and spend time you don't have thinking of obscure or tedious ways to kill mobs (assuming you don't have a perma on your side) and the persistence to harrass elite cabalmates during the rare
I took a quick look. The two characters I looked at got 2000 exp for role and empowerment. Niheriva got 2700. So.. Niheriva really roleplayed his empowerment well.
I admit, I do get annoyed at PBFs and Imm exp. But this isn't one of them. Like I said, if you or anyone who agrees with you wants to see embarassing Imm exp padding that will make you envious, go to your own arial battler
Unless I'm mistaken, every class can avoid lightning control lag by getting a lightning shield.
Whereas only a handful of classes have access to a protective shield equivalent to avoid bash.
Evade? Works for lashes and bash.
Enlarge/reduce? Not a credible defense against a competent enemy with greeting the avalanche.
So what is your argument? I think it's clear that a giant
The simple solution is for you to play a drow AP with lashes.
I think the skill is too much also, but not because of eletric control stun (rather, it's because lashes does too much utility at once with only a two round lag). And oh, by the way, the electric control is counterable. Technically, it is counterable by every class. Whereas giant bash with greeting is not.
It is an immense amount of boilerplate information submitted to you in a restricted period of time while you are given a constant stream of minor verbal assurances ("Oh, this is just what we talked about.. nothing's changed"), and having done it twice, I really don't think the vast majority of people can understand it or properly evaluate it. I think Orb's situation is r
I kind of see this like the Republican version of welfare housing.
It's a bizarre, inefficient solution. That I don't benefit from - and based on what you're writing, I doubt you do, either.