For the love of god, why is it that every time anyone makes a negative comment on a log some jerkoff has to reply with the same, "You're just butthurt!" bullshit? Can someone not just see something they dont like and comment on it? Why do they have to have a character featured in the log to dislike what they see?
Here's a thought experiment:
Let's just take it fo
I understand that iceball is one of the main tools for AP's to be competitive, but what was it about wrath that made it so nerfable but not iceball? Also, it doesn't seem THAT easy to cover because APs use it all the time and get kills from it. I guess if you look at iceball in a vacuum then yeah, it's not that bad. When you look at is with ABS and the Unholy goodness then having
There's all kind of logs that I've seen were 'confirmed' vets cast it...over and over again. ( totally not spamming) And no, I am not computer savy enough to post links. You strike me as a man that has never had to play against and iceball spamming AP.
Just for the record, I actually do think that ap's spam iceball in case I coming off as too much of a smirking douche
How is it that wrath got nerfed but this spell didn't? I mean, shit, the fucking spell only costs 15 mana for christ sakes and it saps movement. There's clearly a reason that a lot of APs spam it. It just seems a bit much. Also, wtf is with dispel? How broken is that shit. All these logs just reminded me of how ridiculous it is. I mean, if you couldn't cast while you were figh
I'm not giving old boy shit for fleeing, or any kind of tactics within the log. I defer to his judgement, ya know? What I am criticizing are the comments he makes ,which I find inconsistent with his actions in the log.
You can't call people clowns and then run away because you're worried that said clowns will take from 80% to death without you being able to do anything about it.
You know as well as I do that that was :
1- A pretty good impression.
and
2- A pretty good sarcastic critique of some silliness in a log.
And I'm not butthurt. I'm annoyed.
That's a pretty healthy dose of "caution" against a group that is seemingly so incompetent(at least judging from the comments). He also says, "nice try". Okay, well it seems like they were trying to raid...so they didn't really try as much as they simply did. You see what I'm saying?
You see, bash is one of the many forms of command denial AKA, "Lagging". When someone lands a bash on you, the commands that you have entered in for your unfortunate character are denied, or 'lagged' for certain amount of 'rounds' in combat. So, even you were to try and type in 'flee' or anything else, if the bash lands then the command you entered in for
If your game plan in reliant on a couple of pieces of choice gear then you should rethink you paradigm. If your success is NOT based on a few pieces of choice gear, then it's a petty thing that you dont need to worry about. Obviously the players playing these characters can't play past certain pieces of equipment so they have to resort to hoarding to compete, which at the end of the d
So I' guess my only question is what do you think of anti-paladins? Because in the hands of skilled players, they are unkillable ( I dont need to list the examples, do I?) I mean, if you don't think that anti paladins are a problem, then the critique of monks, champions, assassins is that less skilled players can be competitive with them, right? Because that's the difference bet
The fact that he played a monk and thought that it was OP doesn't matter. It's that fact that he apparently doesn't have any problems killing them or not being killed by them. You're not saying that he didn't fight any of them are you? (because if that's the case then never mind). This is my logic:
1. With ten characters he must have fought monks and bat-paladi
That's super impressive. So he didn't have a lot of trouble with monks or bat-paladins then? I mean with that kind of success how can you bitch about anything really?