For example, as a paladin against much weaker opponents, you can afford to spend time throwing a few weaker skills at them. Also, sometimes playing dead works well - if you're an enlarged shield pally with the right virtues, bash may not be very effective on you, but if the opponent is an enlarged duergar you don't wanna scare him away right away, so you sort of maledict him a little, s
Nowadays, there's a lot of stuff which lets a single character become more powerful, mostly preps and gear, and the primary balancing factor (huge-ass unescapable gangs) which lets individual less-powerful heroes compete with overgeared overprepped powergamey lunatics is much less frequent, due to lower playerbase.
Also, the introduction of stuff like anti-gank code and the removal of mo
No shit mindlessly using bloodthirst will get you killed. There are definitely times where you can put yourself at a huge disadvantage using bloodthirst, such as fighting a skilled high-level summoner or when dealing with someone with similarly overpowered cabal abilities (a/b/sed scion?). That doesn't really change the fact that it takes very little skill to win fights with bloodthirst, esp
its ok though I think the character's interesting anyway.
I also think Shura was a bit harder to kill with low #s: if the player average was 80+ most of the day, would be much easier to set up some unescapable ganks.
But I think I'd prefer a weapon thats easily concealable to something thats an overt threat.
So lets call it, silenced glock 18. With an extended clip, its a 31 round machine pistol - with a regular clip, its more easily concealable.
Its a variant of the extremely common glock17 used by law enforcement and military everywhere, so its ammo will also be fairly common and easy to replace
But in this log, Ohbehb was basically the power combo. The player of Targrala basically stood no chance against Ohbehb while he was thirsting, and its only because Ohbehb was so confident in his ridiculous combo that he was willing to fight in fatigue and the player of Targrala was able to kill him.
Or, to phrase it another way, thank god prepwhoring like that will let you beat stupidly strong
Because the number of postulates required for any given point is entirely subjective
For example, regarding God:
A christian believer would have a single Postulate regarding Him: God exists. Assuming this statement is true, all other things in his belief system thus derive from it.
Meanwhile, an atheist would require multiple postulates to assume the existence of God: he'd need to p
I've always thought Occam's Razor was a shitty, shitty method for defining how useful any argument or set of assumptions is.
You could also basically make any argument with Occam's Razor, and as long as you frame it properly, Occam will support you.
1) Instead of all this scientific mumbo-jumbo about physics and relativity that is imperfectly understood and nigh-impossible to
Iraq war was started to weed out those who wouldn't go along with the abuse of innocent civilians. So you better support the Iraq war, or else you're playing into the government's hand.
Abortion and birth control was legalized to target those with strong religious beliefs. So you religious types better support abortion, or else you're playing right into the government'
No other player of the game is griefed by the death of neutral NPCs, so unless you have an extremely strong RP reason not to kill neutral npcs, I consider them more or less free game. I wouldn't call killing them powergamey at all, although it does deviate from general RP guidelines. The imms have repeatedly stated that this is sort of a grey area, and you're not likely to get punished
By this standard, someone who refuses to full sac, multikill, and gang his enemies is a powergamer:
Most conventional RP would call for you to see that your enemies lack proper equipment, and to see that they are dead as efficiently and as quickly as possible. However, I would consider a player who refuses to engage in this kind of behavior a fairly decent player, and not a powergamer at all.
Otherwise, the ultimate incentive is for chancellor to uninduct everyone but 2-3 people who perma with him during his playtimes. Adds cool RP angles? Sure. Adds cool OOC incentives? Not... so much.
I mean, if you wanna try justifying looting with silly limp-dick rationalizations graatch-style, go ahead.
But in this case especially, not touching the loot was a definite sign of good sportsmanship. I see almost nothing in there which would have been useful for Ohbehb, which means to me that the only reason he would take things from that set was to dick over Shura by making Shura go re-gear
not a big deal if its your charmies tanking the damage but if one of your groupmates is a slowed transmuter and he gets the first hit after a sleep, big problem.
We all roll ranger or assassin or transmuter
You get points for when you invite other people to group with you, and then lead them to a place where they die. Make sure to full sac and taunt, or else it won't count. Bonus: Lead them to a deathtrap, then sit at the pit where their gear respawns. Either you get a chance to multikill them while they're nearly naked, or you get a chance t
Rather than produce arguments which support your assertion, you say something stupid and then demand people produce evidence to discredit you. Then, you try to poke holes in their argument. And you do it badly. Most people pass this stage of failed argumentative logic sometime in high school - perhaps you should go back to finish your education before you try to say something on the internet.
approximately a little before 2050 white people will become a minority, and hispanics will become the dominant ethnicity in the United States.
Or so I've heard~