Posted by Dyston on March 27, 2000 at 09:42:28:
In Reply to: hmmm, well...let me put it this way. posted by Grallon on March 27, 2000 at 09:23:23:
> If I had a warder right now, I would not be sitting in town, and running into every town looking for people to kill....and yes, I would voice this oppinion. I am the first to admit that sometimes arbies make mistakes...lag plus having 15 people give you tells at once plus being human tend to do that. I am not saying arbies are not perfect.
My point to you.. since you utterly missed it... this is the only part
you see. Do you actually know for a fact they don't do anything else?
I had the chance to see otherwise. Have you?
> Hmmm, I see, you beleive that a working history of sylvan is
> 1)Created
> 2)Sylvan
> 3)Pikel
Ummmm no Grallon. But you are speaking from relative ignorance.
Did you have a Warder under Pikel at all? You said you didn't so
your opinion is quite one sided and lacking all the facts.
> I am done with sylvans, at least for a while....I roll chars AFTER I get a character idea and history in my head that I wish to roleplay. If I think of a sylvan role that I want to play, then I will...I do NOT roll a char for any reason than the express reason of rping. I do not roll a char just to change a cabal being messed up.
Missing the point again. If you are going to sit there and claim
that today's warders are sad, I challenge you to do better. So,
when you think of a suitable roll, give it a shot.
> Not whining. I have time on my hands...I have oppinions, and they are not groundless, and they are at least partly thought out.
Sure they aren't groundless, but they aren't well structured either.
You are still arguing/bitching/moaning/whining from not having all
the facts. They are all "tainted" to how you see them. Not having a
Warder under Pikel.. not having first hand knowledge of Pikel as a
Warder weakens your argument quite a bit.
> Why is it that whenever someone offers a little social commentary, irl or about cf, that anyone who disagrees automatically calls "WHINE!!!! STOP WHINING!!!!!"
Grallon.. it's whining because you offer NO SOLUTIONS. I don't have to
read your response to know what you are going to say. You've repeated it
so many times. Never once have you offered any sort of resolution, and
then left it alone.
> 1) see above, it is not whining.
> 2) it is different,
heh, no it isn't. (see above)
> a)98% of bitching about arbies on the forum is from people who either do not know what arbiters are supposed to do in a situation, or are pissed at getting caught.
You are bitching about only what you perceive. You don't have all the facts either.
> b) my social commentary on the current state of a number of cabals is based on my past experiences in each of the cabals that I talk about, and are influenced by my current character's experiences little, if at all.
The key here is past experience. Do you have anything CURRENT to support your claims?
> quite a differance, would you not say?
Nope.
> DISCLAIMER
> 1)I am not bitching about fairness, balance, bad rp
WTF???? Excuse me? You've moaned about how bad rp it is
for a Warder to go hunting into a city. How warders in
the past have been punished for such bad behavior. Did I
miss something?
> 2) I am only making a statement of how I see the current state of cabal politics, compared to some of my past experiences....and yes it is a bit derrogatory, but calling it like you see it is NOT synonimous with whining.
State your point, offer a solution or some sort of resolution
and leave it alone.