I hate to say this: But can we get the Anath'ing Immortal's response? (text)

I hate to say this: But can we get the Anath'ing Immortal's response? (text):
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]

Posted by Khiravn on May 11, 2000 at 13:13:22:

In Reply to: How to get anathema posted by Baalimon on May 11, 2000 at 07:52:18:

I think this thread should have been deleted. Because its existence causes problems. Reading it, I have no idea how I'm supposed to act in a raiding situation. You can't tell your group where targets are in the midst of a raid?? Is that true?? Because that is the only thing these two did.

And if that is true, and you are supposed to never group with an Imperial (because you might inadvertently assist them through mentioning when a PK enters the area) never raid with an Imperial (because you might inadvertently assist them through attacking the same PK or mentioning when a PK has moved) never defend with another Imperial (same reasons)? If that's the case, that is fine. But this is not at all clear in the Imperial or the Sect laws.

Since this thread wasn't deleted, and it likely affects the actions of people playing an Imperial, can there be a response to this? The Empire 101 doesn't cover assisting other Imperials through giving enemy whereabouts in the midst of obeying Imperial Law (#2) in the *midst* of a raid when the Codex is in grave danger.

Thank you to the Immortal that Anath'd them in advance.

Follow Ups:

The way I see it. Boogy 17:57:38 5/11/2000 (1)
- You are absolutely correct. The healer should not have been anath'd. (N/T) Cas 12:58:11 5/12/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> I think this thread should have been deleted. Because its existence causes problems. Reading it, I have no idea how I'm supposed to act in a raiding situation. You can't tell your group where targets are in the midst of a raid?? Is that true?? Because that is the only thing these two did. > > And if that is true, and you are supposed to never group with an Imperial (because you might inadvertently assist them through mentioning when a PK enters the area) never raid with an Imperial (because you might inadvertently assist them through attacking the same PK or mentioning when a PK has moved) never defend with another Imperial (same reasons)? If that's the case, that is fine. But this is not at all clear in the Imperial or the Sect laws. > > Since this thread wasn't deleted, and it likely affects the actions of people playing an Imperial, can there be a response to this? The Empire 101 doesn't cover assisting other Imperials through giving enemy whereabouts in the midst of obeying Imperial Law (#2) in the midst of a raid when the Codex is in grave danger. > > Thank you to the Immortal that Anath'd them in advance.

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]