Though cloud giant con is good, Rager con is often lower, especially for an old vet like Ioanis. (n/t)

Though cloud giant con is good, Rager con is often lower, especially for an old vet like Ioanis. (n/t):
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]

Posted by Proud Blade(VIP) on June 2, 2000 at 12:07:45:

In Reply to: Three reasons posted by Imbrogno on June 2, 2000 at 12:00:56:

> 1) It costs 50 mana, I had 54 at the time.
>
> 2) I have no idea what his con is like, but cloud giant con is generally pretty good.
>
> 3) I didn't feel it was necessary, what with 3 or 4 plagues and him at writhing. I've faith in my ability to chase.

Follow Ups:

Rot (woulda been n/t, but too long) Khiravn 15:49:54 6/2/2000 (23)
- Re: Rot (woulda been n/t, but too long) Cheap Tactic? 18:02:32 6/2/2000 (16)
  - His point... or possibly one of them Saerin 08:16:59 6/3/2000 (15)
    - Khiravn's worst enemy was a shaman who he fought constantly. It's not like one wither did that. (n/t) Proud Blade(VIP) 09:56:40 6/3/2000 (0)
    - Rot is also incredibly easy to combat. nt Imbrogno 08:42:21 6/3/2000 (10)
      - No it isn't. There are ways, but it depends on who you are. A rager with depleted con is in big trouble. (n/t) Proud Blade(VIP) 09:49:41 6/3/2000 (9)
        
        Yes it is Imbrogno 11:11:57 6/3/2000 (8)
        
        I love when people say things like "Just get two rings of fortitude". (n/t) Proud Blade(VIP) 12:11:49 6/3/2000 (7)
        
        Fine, don't wanna do fortitudes... Imbrogno 12:23:41 6/3/2000 (6)
        
        Look: Khiravn 12:40:45 6/3/2000 (5)
        
        my opinion, not that you asked for one Nepenthe(IMM) 14:50:48 6/3/2000 (3)
        
        Heh Imbrogno 14:53:51 6/3/2000 (2)
        
        Re: Heh Nepenthe(IMM) 15:03:42 6/3/2000 (1)
        
        I tell you what, I'll trade cause light/serious/critical and demonfire for magic missile. nt Imbrogno 15:47:03 6/3/2000 (0)
        
        Looking at all of the facts can be fun too Imbrogno 13:21:09 6/3/2000 (0)
    - Get your info straight. Wither decreases lifespan in hours. Rot does not. *smack* n/t Uhhhmmmm 08:24:35 6/3/2000 (2)
      - My other point still stands. It's weak to rot someone and run off. Clear enough? (n/t) Saerin 08:51:27 6/3/2000 (1)
        
        I think I'd rather have them run off, that way I can run some place safe and be sure to get my gear back at the very least. NT Smirk 09:07:30 6/3/2000 (0)
- Don't you dare think for a moment that Arlian wouldn't flee/sleep/fiend me in a heartbeat. nt Imbrogno 16:04:44 6/2/2000 (5)
  - Only in your mind does flee/fiend equate to rot/recall. The only purpose of the 2nd is to easily con kill someone. n/t Khiravn 17:14:35 6/2/2000 (4)
    - One word: Power Word Kill. Game, Set, Match. nt Grallon 11:07:26 6/7/2000 (0)
    - and to me that's a beautiful thing. I hate ragers ooc and ic. nt Imbrogno 17:51:39 6/2/2000 (2)
      - Reality check. Forum Reader 08:18:28 6/3/2000 (0)
      - finally: Leradok 03:41:01 6/3/2000 (0)
All very true, but from this side of the fence it seems like con quests are handed out like candy. Though I know that isn't the case, it seems that way :) nt Imbrogno 12:10:58 6/2/2000 (1)
- Or to put it more simply, and in a less inflammatory fashion, it's smart not to make assumptions about the con of ragers. nt Imbrogno 12:13:28 6/2/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > 1) It costs 50 mana, I had 54 at the time. > > > > 2) I have no idea what his con is like, but cloud giant con is generally pretty good. > > > > 3) I didn't feel it was necessary, what with 3 or 4 plagues and him at writhing. I've faith in my ability to chase.