Doesn't fuck with game balance in the slightest, it's just a rule your cabal has to live with to keep it's power

Doesn't fuck with game balance in the slightest, it's just a rule your cabal has to live with to keep it's power:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]

Posted by Graham on August 18, 2000 at 04:03:48:

In Reply to: That is all fine and good....BUT posted by Cast on August 17, 2000 at 23:59:39:

> in an rp point of view, that is all fine and good. but in a game balance point, it is kind of fucked up.
>
>
> WHy?
>
> Because it takes bria saying "ok" for the arbiters to be able to retaliate in kind.
>
> So for the 4 months it takes Bria to do that, you can take the book, but they cant take the head.
>
> That is just makes the game more unfair than it has to be.
>
> It's just like the whole shaman of battle thing.
>
> sure their can be valid in char arguments for it. but it would fuck with game balance.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > in an rp point of view, that is all fine and good. but in a game balance point, it is kind of fucked up. > > > > > > WHy? > > > > Because it takes bria saying "ok" for the arbiters to be able to retaliate in kind. > > > > So for the 4 months it takes Bria to do that, you can take the book, but they cant take the head. > > > > That is just makes the game more unfair than it has to be. > > > > It's just like the whole shaman of battle thing. > > > > sure their can be valid in char arguments for it. but it would fuck with game balance.