Re: Ambush is more limited/restricted than backstab (and hurts less) n/t

Re: Ambush is more limited/restricted than backstab (and hurts less) n/t:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]

Posted by A little peeved. on August 30, 2000 at 15:06:49:

In Reply to: Ambush is more limited/restricted than backstab (and hurts less) n/t posted by TotW(VIP) on August 30, 2000 at 14:52:57:

> > How come you can ambush someone when hurt and not
> > backstab or assassinate? If the argument is that you
> > have a chance to kill someone in one blow? Backstab
> > can't kill you with one blow always, assassinate (no comment). IMM should change it back to how it was.

From the post up there, UNSPEAK, hurts. Any additional
info on what limit of ambush?

Follow Ups:

Re: Ambush is more limited/restricted than backstab (and hurts less) n/t ranger 15:24:59 8/30/2000 (1)
- and dual backstab (nt) Magtograme 15:39:13 8/30/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > > How come you can ambush someone when hurt and not > > > backstab or assassinate? If the argument is that you > > > have a chance to kill someone in one blow? Backstab > > > can't kill you with one blow always, assassinate (no comment). IMM should change it back to how it was. > > From the post up there, UNSPEAK, hurts. Any additional > info on what limit of ambush?