Ambush is more limited/restricted than backstab (and hurts less) n/t

Ambush is more limited/restricted than backstab (and hurts less) n/t:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]

Posted by TotW(VIP) on August 30, 2000 at 14:52:57:

In Reply to: How come ambush and not backstab or asssinate? posted by Pissed on August 30, 2000 at 14:48:28:

> How come you can ambush someone when hurt and not
> backstab or assassinate? If the argument is that you
> have a chance to kill someone in one blow? Backstab
> can't kill you with one blow always, assassinate (no comment). IMM should change it back to how it was.

Follow Ups:

Re: Ambush is more limited/restricted than backstab (and hurts less) n/t A little peeved. 15:06:49 8/30/2000 (2)
- Re: Ambush is more limited/restricted than backstab (and hurts less) n/t ranger 15:24:59 8/30/2000 (1)
  - and dual backstab (nt) Magtograme 15:39:13 8/30/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > How come you can ambush someone when hurt and not > > backstab or assassinate? If the argument is that you > > have a chance to kill someone in one blow? Backstab > > can't kill you with one blow always, assassinate (no comment). IMM should change it back to how it was.