How come ambush and not backstab or asssinate?

How come ambush and not backstab or asssinate?:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]

Posted by Pissed on August 30, 2000 at 14:48:28:

In Reply to: Bad way to die.. worse then getting gaunt into centurions when you are anathema posted by Vilkokin ger? You yell 'you there ranger?' Someone coughs violently. Someone scratches some bumps on its face leaving them oozing a brown liquid. say that I don't c Someone mutters something quiet on August 30, 2000 at 13:53:03:

How come you can ambush someone when hurt and not
backstab or assassinate? If the argument is that you
have a chance to kill someone in one blow? Backstab
can't kill you with one blow always, assassinate (no comment). IMM should change it back to how it was.

Follow Ups:

Ambush is more limited/restricted than backstab (and hurts less) n/t TotW(VIP) 14:52:57 8/30/2000 (3)
- Re: Ambush is more limited/restricted than backstab (and hurts less) n/t A little peeved. 15:06:49 8/30/2000 (2)
  - Re: Ambush is more limited/restricted than backstab (and hurts less) n/t ranger 15:24:59 8/30/2000 (1)
    - and dual backstab (nt) Magtograme 15:39:13 8/30/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> How come you can ambush someone when hurt and not > backstab or assassinate? If the argument is that you > have a chance to kill someone in one blow? Backstab > can't kill you with one blow always, assassinate (no comment). IMM should change it back to how it was.