The third (or, maybe, even second) best way is ...

The third (or, maybe, even second) best way is ...:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]

Posted by Uli on September 3, 2000 at 14:01:53:

In Reply to: The second best way to find wands/scrolls/staves/etc. posted by Imbrogno, dancing an Irish Jig in honor of Notre Dame's win yesterday.(VIP) on September 3, 2000 at 11:12:22:

... to track someone who probably knows.

Well, imagine that you are sitting in some area doing something
or even nothing. Then somebody tells you: could you please leave
the area for some time? (I personally never do that if
the wand is not there, but many people will). If the person
is obviously alone and does not want the mobs to repop,
it is a signal. Next time you can try to track someone,
hitting "where" a million times. Believe me, it works.
I and wouldn't classify it as cheating, actually. Just a
valid use of game mechanics...

I doubt Immortals could change something in the code since
I did that last time :-)

Follow Ups:

An entropy taught my arbiter where the anti-magic shell scroll was. Imbrogno(VIP) 15:08:36 9/3/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> ... to track someone who probably knows. > > Well, imagine that you are sitting in some area doing something > or even nothing. Then somebody tells you: could you please leave > the area for some time? (I personally never do that if > the wand is not there, but many people will). If the person > is obviously alone and does not want the mobs to repop, > it is a signal. Next time you can try to track someone, > hitting "where" a million times. Believe me, it works. > I and wouldn't classify it as cheating, actually. Just a > valid use of game mechanics... > > I doubt Immortals could change something in the code since > I did that last time :-)