Posted by Shokai(IMM) on September 10, 2000 at 23:04:32:
In Reply to: I'm not commenting anymore, see if I still get bitched at. posted by Fuath on September 10, 2000 at 12:20:38:
Now, (In case you don't know) I'm not a battle or arbiter imm....and typically don't play either rager or arbie...just doesn't fit the roles I normally come up with. But unless I'm mistaken, I'm sure there was a mage or 5 somewhere in range....and last time I checked Fuath was a warrior. Now, I add things up...and it seems to me that the Battle Bully Syndrome has shown back up...and unless someone takes the reigns over, I predict (in a month or so) people wondering where the hell all the ragers are. Since everytime I've seen Battle and Arbiters clash...all the lowbie ragers end up with a pk hole of nasty proportions. But I'm digressing here...
What amazes me, is that the rager in this log went directly for a warrior...cabal relations aside, doesn't that strike anyone else as a bit hinky? I mean c'mon...how the hell are you going to rid the world of magic if you start killing all the warriors...warriors who if you're PR was a little better..could convieably be on your side of the whole war against magic.
Just something I noticed and felt like posting about. I would like to be on the record as saying that if ragers and arbies want to have wars, that's skippy...this was just an observation, nothing more.
"Level edge, backs against the ledge
no knives, the stone hard eyes
without the longing
or fear that it would disappear
they clung on,
nurturing never-ending obsessions on the table"
- Skinny Puppy